Why the Kurds should boycott the Arabic, Iranian and Turks languages and the present educational system at all?

Parallel with the violence and terror against the Kurds to occupy the Kurdish motherland by the Arabs, Iranians and Turks since the conquering of the Muslims, the modern established education system has the main role to uproot “genocide” the Kurdish nation virtually and physically from the history.
The available information and education sources are hoaxes and the writing system adapted for Farsi, Turks and Arabic, are tools of formation to do remove the Kurdish language and history from the mind and to transform the Kurds, unconsciously and gradually, to Turks, Arabs and Iranians. In the present education system, the aryanist colonial scholars have the Kurdish history and cultural heritage destroyed, the historical documents falsified, name of the Kurds wiped away from ancient history and invented a false history. For instance, there is a false etymological writing system adopted for Farsi, Arabic and Turks, according to that and according to the contemporary available adopted information and education sources, in the name of science, all existing words in the Near – and Middle East are from Persian, Arabic or Turkish origin; there is no mentioning of Kurdish or a single word which might be originated from Kurdish. In the official, scientific historiography the Kurdish peoples and the Kurdish languages have been introduced as the New Persians that are came into existence about 9th century AD. (“The Rise of the New Persian Language”, in The Cambridge History of Iran Vol. 4 (From the Arab Invasion to the Saljuks) G. Lazard, under redaction of R.N. Frye (London: Cambridge University Press 1975, 595-633). And they have success in their mission formation and transformation of the Kurds, unconsciously and gradually: There are millions of people who consider themselves as Syrian, Iraqi, Turk or Iranian, they do not know of Kurdish but they remember yet that their grandparents were Kurds. Increasingly regions from the Kurdish territory cut off and turn into territories of the Arabs, Iranians and Turks. Increasingly Kurds in the Kurdish regions assimilate and absorb into Turks, Arabic, and Farsi.
The only way to stop this trend of genocide is a Confederation of Independent Kurdish National State or United States of Independent Kurdsu; wherein all Kurdish regional languages, cultural heritage, and natural sources must be protected. Since the WW1, geopolitically the region has never been as favorable as now for independent Kurdsán states one after the other! The Kurds should prepare their own mind and mental to make that possible!
Let us take into consideration the following examples:

Kurdish names (from ca. 3300 BC)
In present Kurdi In present Arawi/Farsi/Turki
Séyášum Sayed Hashum
Sé.Mámaí Sayed Mohammad
Šáwe.Sén, Malek.Sén Šáh.Hossain, Malek Hossain
Apú., Abú., Apí.Sén Abú.Hossain
Sén.šár.ešken (Kurdi ca. 800 BC)
source The Mother of Cultures, Bérai 2005

I said here that the Arabic, Farsi and Turks adopted names “Sayed, Hashum, Mohammad, Abú, Hossain etc.” are derivations of the original Kurdish names. That is proven, both linguistically and historically. Subsequently the Sé (Sayed) clans, spread throughout all Kurdsu are native Kurds, their name Sé appears in ancient documents from ca. 3000 BC, but in the present education system they are identified (falsely) as Arabs decedents of the prophet Mohammad of the Islam.

The Kurds are adapted to use the Arabic, Farsi and Turks word form Kurdistan instead of the proper Kurdish Kurdsu, Kurdsán. The Kurds are adapted to use the Arabic, Farsi and Turks word form Ibrahim instead of the proper Kurdish Ura, Uram, Braim, Brahim, Ibraim or Bel, Bela. The Kurds are adapted to use the Arabic, Farsi and Turks word form Sayed instead of the proper Kurdish . The Kurds are adapted to use the Arabic, Farsi and Turks word form Hossain instead of the proper Kurdish Sén. The Kurds are adapted to use the Arabic, Farsi and Turks word form Mohammad instead of the proper Kurdish Mama, Máma, Mámaí, etc.
That is why I’m saying that the Kurds should boycott the Arabic, Iranian and Turks languages and the present educational system at all. As long as the Kurds do not that they are not seriously busy with the defense of the existence of the Kurdish people.

Sep 16, 2012

Hamíit Qliji Bérai

An Acknowledgment: Indo-European Languages Originated in Anatolia, “southern Turkey” Biologists Say

This is another acknowledgment of the claims made in the Bible Discovered; after the new DNA-research by Genealogist Anatole A. Klyosov(1), has proven that in earliest traceable origins, the Kurds are obviously descendants of indigenous (first) Neolithic Northern Fertile Crescent aborigines. The new entrant to the debate is an evolutionary biologist, Quentin Atkinson and colleagues of the University of Auckland in New Zealand. NYTimes “Biologists using tools developed for drawing evolutionary family trees say that they have solved a longstanding problem in archaeology: the origin of the Indo-European family of languages.” In the “Bible Discovered” in at least, 120 arbitrary cases, morphological and phonological, I have proved that the similarity between Indo-European languages derived from ancient Near East (Kurdish) roots, thus not from the Indo-European. Consequently the scientific legitimacy of the term “Indo-European” falls at all. The scientific legitimacy of existence of the Indo-Aryans, Indo-Iranian, Aryo-Germany languages, -peoples and the Ancient Iran, have been disputed at all. For the same reasons, the division of languages to Indo-European and Semitic is unscientific and cannot stand. Under the Dingir, Dinkir and Babilu, Babili, has been clear that the Semitic languages cannot exist. I proved that the ancient countries or languages and civilizations of the Elamite, Sumerian, Babylonian, Akkadian, Hittitian, Assyrian, Syriac, Hurrian, etc., could not exist. Those were Kurds and Kurdish languages recognizable in the present myriad Kurdish languages.   Note: In the announcement states that – Words that have a clear line of descent from the same ancestral word are known as cognates. Thus “mother,” “mutter” (German), “mat’ ” (Russian), “madar” (Persian), “matka” (Polish) and “mater” (Latin) are all cognates derived from the proto-Indo-European word “mehter.” It is notable that the word mother (Kurdish máíar) and its cognates are not derived from the proto-Indo-European word “mehter”, but they are rooted in the ancient Near East (Kurdish) word /ma/, má/, which means “female; location, space, remained, stay-place; a recessed part to receive a complementary male part, the female section of an object”. See Bible Discovered pages 199-218. *****   Family Tree of Languages Has Roots in Anatolia, Biologists Say By NICHOLAS WADE Published: August 24, 2012   The result, they announced in Thursday’s issue of the journal Science, is that “we found decisive support for an Anatolian origin over a steppe origin.” Both the timing and the root of the tree of Indo-European languages “fit with an agricultural expansion from Anatolia beginning 8,000 to 9,500 years ago,” they report. The computer was also given geographical information about the present range of each language and told to work out the likeliest pathways of distribution from an origin, given the probable family tree of descent. The calculation pointed to Anatolia, particularly a lozenge-shaped area in what is now southern Turkey, as the most plausible origin – a region that had also been proposed as the origin of Indo-European by the archaeologist Colin Renfrew, in 1987, because it was the source from which agriculture spread to Europe. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/science/indo-european-languages-originated-in-anatolia-analysis-suggests.xml  (1) See the DNA-data in The Origin of Kurds by Ferdinand Hennerbichler, February 25th, 2012:  http://www.elamirkan.net/originofkurds.pdf  Note: I understood, the content of the link for DNA reports that I earlier had indicated was later changed, because of that I published the copy in my possession. The DNA data are self-evidence cannot be denied.   Aug. 24, 2012 Hamiit Qliji Berai

Educations News: An Interview with Hamiit Qliji Berai: Bible Discovered

 

Dr. Shaughnessy, Eastern New Mexico University Portales, New Mexico is currently Professor in Educational Studies and is a Consulting Editor for Gifted Education International and Educational Psychology Review. In addition, he writes for EducationViews.org and the International Journal of Theory and Research in Education….

Michael Shaughnessy EducationNews Senior Columnist on June 6, 2012

Michael F. Shaughnessy –

1) First of all, tell us about yourself, where you were born, and where you are currently working and what you are researching.
I was born on July 26, 1960, in Béra, Ilam province, Eastern Kurdsán. That is the archaeological site Béra.xáni “Béra dukedom” (the Farsi Badreh). From 1990, I have been of Dutch (Netherlands) nationality, a citizen of The Hague.
Since 1994, I have dedicated my whole time to independently researching the ancient Near East archaeological sources for early culture, history and ethnography of the mankind, all over the world in different universities including the University of Leiden Netherlands, the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, the University of Chicago, British Museum, London University and the British Library in London.

Those are texts from ca. 4000 BC, traces of human civilization and objects from millions years ago, excavated in the Kurdish regions. I take a different approach, a multidisciplinary scientific approach from the perspective Kurdish oral traditions, consist of myriad languages, literature, names etc.of the sites where the ancient sources come from. My research has led to an adequate understanding of the ancient sources, which shows the world of the ancient Near East in a completely different way than some know it to be now.

2) Now, tell us about this book “Bible Discovered” – when did you decide to write it and why?
In 2009, I decided to prepare the publication of the discovery of the Bible part. Because of the huge amount of linguistically, historically and anthropologically innovation subjects, I had to limit the title. The Bible Discovered is a result of the development of my research. Further deepening and expanding of my statements in the Berai 2002, Het Elamitisch de nieuwe verklaring and Berai 2003, Hoe oud zijn de Kurden (in Duth), see the books on http://www.elamirkan.net/?p=365.
3) Are you focusing on the Old or New Testament?
The Bible was not the intention of my research but in the course of the search I realized and for the first time, concrete traces of many of the Old Testament stories in the archaeological texts and identified the biblical roots, figures, terms and also some Christian traditions and symbols of the New Testament in the archaeological sources.
4) Are you examining the Bible from a literature perspective, or an archeological perspective?
From the archaeological perspective, I made connection between some of the biblical tales with archaeological evidences, which provide the scientific legitimacy for the biblical accounts.
5) Why study social systems in the Bible- what relevance are they?
The patriarchally terms in the Bible and the Kurdish language are controllable facts, accordingly to justify that by the modern scholars identified determinatives for identification of names of the Gods, countries and cities are false.
Consequently, the contemporary accepted ancient Near East gods names are false, they cannot stand. The ancient “dinger, dinker, il, ila, ili, ilu, nap, nab” which are identified as determinative before divine names, in accordance with examination of these terms in the contexts, they are not determinatives before divine names.”
For instance, traditionally the word Babel (Babylon) stands instead of the next words:
Ba, Bau, Babu, Babili, Babilu, Ka-, Kaka, Gaga, Din-, Dinkir, Ka-dinger-raki, Bábil, Pápil, Apal, Abali, Pápiili, pápiili(ir-ra), Bábiŕu, Bábiŕuš, Bábiŕuaw, Bábiŕuv(w)iya, bábiliki, báwiliki, etc.
In other words, the scholars, at the translation of ancient Near East scripts, have replaced and demonstrated these words with Bable or Babylon.
In Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon), I gathered together these, from the decipherment of the cuneiform scripts, which are demonstrated by great researchers like W. Hinz, Rykle Borger, JA. Brinkman. M.J. Steve and others in the field of ancient Near East Civilization.
Except Din “religion” and Dingir, Dinkir “origin of the word cardinal, religious profession”, the rest of these names mean “father, papal, fatherly, patriarch or patriarchally”; that is clear in present Kurdish.
Dinger or dinker is identified as determinative before God’s name and stands also for the word Babylon (above). It is true according to Kurdish that ká dingirraki “fatherly religious-ministry” = Bábiliki “papally-ministry, patriarchal-ship, fathership” as a social system. But ká dingirraki cannot be replaced with Bábiliki (Babylon), as it happened. Bábiliki and ká-dingirraki in no sense indicate Babylon (land, country).
Indeed, it is well known in adopted available information and educational sources in dictionaries and in the Encyclopedias that Babel (Babylon) means “Gate of Gods” and the holy Bible has been described as: [Middle English, from Old French, from Late Latin biblia, from Greek, pl. of biblion, book, diminutive of biblos, papyrus, papyrus, pa.py.rus.es or pa.py.ri (-r) “papyrus, book, from Bublos, Byblos”. [Middle English papirus, from Latin paprus, from Greek papros], plural of biblion book, diminutive of biblos papyrus, from Bublos Phoenician port from which Greece obtained Egyptian papyrus]. Apocrypha (Books of the Bible). (Collins English Dictionary -Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003.)
It is clear now that the “biblia, pl. biblion, biblos, papyrus, papyruses or papyri (-r), Bublos, Byblos” are certainly derived from the ancient Near East, the Kurdish pa, ba, baw or bab. Compare the holy Bible to Bábil, Pápil, Apal which mean “papal, fatherly, patriarchal”; Compare papyrus to Bábiŕu, Bábiŕuš, Bábiŕuaw, Bábiŕuv(w)iya “in the manner of father, patriarchally, fatherly” and compare papyri(-r) to Pápiili, pápiili(ir-ra) “papally, patriarchally, fatherly”. Compare the English biblically to bábiliki, báwiliki “patriarchally”; compare the Apo-crypha to “Ápú-, fatherly-books”.
Despite all speculations concern the name holy Bible, it is clear now that the Bible certainly has a more ancient root, the ancient Near East Babil (patriarchal). Compare the holy name Bible to Bábil, Pápil, Apal, Abali; which mean “papal, fatherly”. Accordingly it is clear how the Bible-scriptures stand for “patriarchal-books”and nothing else. See Bible Discovered (Note 5) Pictographs for Ba, Bau, Babu, Babili, Babilu, Ka, Din, Dingir and (Note 6) Inconsistency between pictographs for Babylon.
The Biblical Noah might be identified to ancient Near East Nah, Nahhu “the nah”, and Nahunda “objective, the Nah concerns”, which at the accepted decipherments has been identified as the Elams Sun God Nahhunte in Akkad.
The biblical Deluge, the flood story of Noah is the reason behind the name Euphrates River. The variants ancient names for the Euphrates River “(U)frahat, (U)prhat, (U)áma, etc.” are Kurdish words for “deluge, (water)-flood”, which are clearly dedicated to the Biblical deluge, the water flood of Noah.
According to Kurdish, the Biblical Šam son of Noah should be identified to Nabu-shuma “the prophet Šum, Šám”. The ancient Near East tekst Mâr-bîti-shumi-bni which is falsely demonstrated as Mâr-bîti-shum-ibni, might mean “descent of house of Šum”. That is the biblical Šám son of Noah and identical to the state Šám, Šum (the contemporary Syrian capital Damascus and contemporary Syria-Lebanon plateau), which is dedicated to the eponymous ancestor Šum of Noah. Mâr-bîti means “house member(s)”.”
The Kurdish names for Prophet Abraham “Ura and Bela” occur repeatedly in ancient Near East texts, which are the historically reasons behind many dedicated names of regions and patriarchal indications.
The prophet Abraham to be identified in the ancient Near East scripts to napi.ir.úri; according to Kurdish napi.ir.uri means “the prophet Abraham”.
Napi, nabi, nabú “adjectival, naba d.art., mean prophet, from the root nap”. And ura, uri, urám, abráim, bráhím are Kurdish names for Abraham. Very remarkable the Kurdish names for Abram, the Ur variants, have been attested in ancient texts by Borger 331 (182)”
Ur seems to be the root of the word Hebrew. Ura and Abra(m) are the same words, e.g. Kurdish ur “cloud” and Farsi-Arabic loanword abr “cloud”. In this case according to Kurdish Hebrew (Habru, Abru, Uru), adjective plural, means “Abramians, Abrahamians”, which corresponds to the Old Testament story of the Jewish people, Abramians; this is self-evident.”
Ura (Orhay) is the birthplace of Abram and that Nimrud ‘ruled in Erekh, which is Ura, according to Mar Ephraim Súryaya (the Xedr Aliás).
The identification of Ura with Erekh stems from the Biblical passage Erekh, Bible (Gen. 10:10)
“The accepted determinatives for a city name are false, I have proved that repeatedly in the Bible Discovered. Consequently the biblical claim that “Nimrud ruled in Erekh (Ark), which is Ura” is true. The Erekh to be understood as the remained citadel ruins of the Court of Nimrud in the city Ura, Ŕuhá.”
The Bronzes inscriptions from Luuŕsu (treated in the book) prove a single unified culture and diversity in monoculture from Dáĺeki, Húzsu to Bábiliki and the patriarchal divisions.
Dáĺegi is the indigenous name of the present Bushehr (Southeastern Iran). Dáĺegi or Dáĺeki means “motherhood matriarchally, matriarchalism”. Húzsu is the indigenous name of the contemporary Ahwaz in Iran. Húzsu means “multi-party, multiculturalism”. Bábiliki, Báwilaki, Báwĺai stand for Babel (the corrupted Babylon in contemporary Iraq) means “fatherhood, patriarchally, patriarchalism”. Abla (Ebla), Apla, Apú “father, patriarch” is the proper indigenous name of the corrupt Arabized Al-eppo in Syria. The Kurdish patriarchal divisions regard the Ezidian, Jewish and Christian. The Islam is based on the early Kurdish multicultural tradition the Ezidianism, early Judaism and early Christianity.
6) What is this Institute Elamirkan?
Institute Elamirkan is an independent research and educational institution; I established it in 2001 in the Netherlands (registered KVK-number 27199183). Institute Elamirkan replaced the former Kurdish Mirkan Association which was established in 1994 in The Hague Netherlands.
The name Elamirkan is abbreviated of Elam Mirkan which designates cultural heritage of the ancient Kurds. The discovery began with the Elam and Elamite scriptions that are the reason behind the name Elamirkan. But in the course of the research became obvious that not only Elamite, all ancient Near Eastern scriptions (excavated in ancient Kurdish territories) are scribed in Kurdish tribal languages.
I realized, for the first time, that the contemporary accepted interpretations of ancient Near East scriptions are not correct, consequently the scholars have a wrong understanding of the early human civilizations, languages and history. The institutes and museums, consciously or unconsciously, provide the world public and the scientific circuits with wrong information about early human civilizations and ethnography. Many of the historically observed facts behind the conventional scientific wisdom about the early human civilizations are hoaxes. By not taking the time to correct the wrongs, the modern scholars are continuing to falsify ancient documents, and mislead public opinion by providing them with wrong information.
To stop the continuing falsification of ancient Near Eastern historical documents, I call for a serious re-evaluation of what is being put out in academic works and to the public about ancient Near East.
The Institute Elamirkan tries to correct and reinterpret the ancient Near Eastern ethnologies, history and languages. By means of research come to a justifying interpretation of the ancient Near Eastern civilization, where the proof can be given on historical, ethnological, and etymological grounds and is backed up by the cultural relationships between the ancient Near Eastern and European language families in many areas. The Kurdish language and oral traditions play the key role in this discovery.
7) Symbols- why are they important in the big scheme of things?
The cross symbol images on the cover of the Bible Discovered date from 4000 BC.
The wrong assessments of ancient Near East also betray historians, sociologists and philosophers
Philosophy and conceptual religion did not begin with the foundation of the Greek philosophy or the raising of the Chinese or Indic religion, around the sixth century before Christ.
There are archaeological evidences for philosophy and conceptual religion in ancient Near East from at least 4000 before Christ in Kurdish.
America’s premier sociologist, Robert Bellah in a recent book, “Religion in Human Evolution” tries to identify when religion emerged and how it changed through the centuries.
He ends with the Axial Age of the sixth century before Christ, focusing on ancient India, Israel, Greece and China.
Bellah identifies three stages: enactive, symbolic and conceptual. Basic rituals are part of the first, then myth and legend, and finally ethical and theological reasoning. The conceptual stage is one related to the Axial Age, roughly around the sixth century BC, when Plato and other thinkers founded Greek philosophy and the Buddha and other teachers raised Indic religion to a whole new conceptual level, according to Bellah.
From a Kurdish perspective in the book Bible Discovered, I made it clear that the modern sociology and philosophy are based on wrong assessments concern the early culture, history and ethnography of the mankind.
The very notion of the Axial, conceptual stage did not begin with the foundation of the Greek philosophy or the raising of the Chinese or Indic religion, around the sixth century before Christ.
The world’s most influential philosophies were founded at least 4000 before Christ in the ancient Near East in Kurdish language. The Axial symbols (Coptic Cross and Maltese Cross ) in the sense of “religious profession and act, mass, mission” occur on ancient Kurdish care bowls and dishes from 4000 BC; see the cover of Bible Discovered and pg. 104-105; also see under Din-ger-ki, Din-ker-ki, Ul-maš-ki.
The ancient Near East cuneiform sign (maš) means “act, mass, mission”.
The ancient Near East axis, axial, cuneiform sign (dinger, dinker) means “religious profession, cardinal”; from the root din “religion” and ger, ker “create, creator”. So din-ker is the origin of the word car-din-al “religious profession”.
These also make assured that the contemporary assumption – the origins of religious profession date from the time when Christians were recognized in the Church as followers after perfection in the practice of religious life, – is not real and should be corrected in: “the origins of religious profession date from the holy ancient Kurdish time when believers were recognized in the Kerk (Church) as followers after perfection in the practice of religious life.”
8) Who should read this book? Why?
Written for those interested in human history, culture and religion, who are seeking to broaden their understanding of the language, culture, and accomplishments of the ancient people.
Bible Discovered is meant for scholars and serious students of the ancient Near East civilizations and the Biblical archaeology.
Archaeologically, anthropologically, cultural, and linguistically the book is a fascinating, if controversial, counterclaim to accepted doctrines. The book presents a wealth of information for readers to examine. It is filled with unique information as it provides a realistic and ample amount of understanding of the ancient sources of human civilization.
With the further deepening and expanding of the research on subjects which have been discussed in my work, I have enjoyed more and more success in finding scientific proofs and sources for my statements. Those have led to new revelations, which I hope to share with readers along this journey of discovery in the Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon). I call for a serious re-evaluation of what is being put out in academic works and to the public about ancient Near East.
9) Why do you consider this book to be important?
Many of the historically observed facts behind the conventional scientific wisdom about the early human civilizations are hoaxes.
The statements which have become conventional scientific wisdom and public opinion in the name of linguistic, historical and ethnological sciences are inadequate and deceptive.
The well-known ancient Near Eastern civilizations Elam, Babylon, Sumer, Akkad, Hittite, Assyria etc., were not countries or country-languages.
The ancient languages which are unjustly by the European experts called as Elamite, Sumerian, Babylonian, Akkadian, Hittitian, Assyrian, Syriac, Persian etc. cannot stand, since the texts are clearly written in the Kurdish myriad languages and the Babylon, Sumer and Akkad were not countries or country-languages, but patriarchal social systems.
The scientific legitimacy of the division of the languages to Indo-European and Semitic fall at all since the Indo-European related words are rooted in ancient Near East which are more ancient than Sanskrit. And the Semitic languages cannot stand since these languages are more ancient than the Sam. Sam the eponymous ancestor of the Semitic is to be identified in the ancient texts as a Kurdish descendent, thus.
The Table of Nations and the Genealogy of Mankind
The Biblical Noah and his house descendants occur repeatedly in the ancient Near East texts. The listed children of Naoh, the descendants of house of Noah in the bible Genesis 10, cannot be taken as the Table of Nations neither as the Genealogy of Mankind. The chronological bible Genesis indicates only the local Kurdish ethnic groups, identical with the present name of many contiguous Kurdish ethnics and their issued regions.
11) Where can interested scholars get a copy of your book?
“Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)” is available for sale internationally paperback and kindle edition online at Amazon and other channels.

It is also your responsibility

The scholars of the ancient Near East studies remain silent and they pretend nothing is wrong in their field.

In 2011, I circulated a testimonial request letter to the experts in the field of ancient Near East, asking if anyone of them wants to read the manuscript Bible Discovered, Bible = Babel (Babylon) and to say something about it. But, no one dared to take the responsibility to do that because of fear of repression.

Meanwhile, the book was published, in a press release announced that in the Bible Discovered, I have demonstrated hundreds of evidences, which make clear that the contemporary accepted interpretations of ancient Near East scriptions are not correct, consequently the scholars have a wrong understanding of the early human civilization, languages, history and the background of the Bible. Though the scholars of the ancient Near East studies remain silent and they pretend nothing is wrong in their field. They go through with the incorrect interpretations, so they are continuing to falsify ancient documents, and mislead public opinion by providing them with wrong information.

Anyway, it is the moral responsibility of the prominent scholars in the field of ancient Near East to break the silence and to help the true succeed in their endeavors.

Hamíit Qliji Bérai

The Hague, May 21, 2012

How independent Ancient language discovered on clay tablets found amid ruins of 2800 year old Middle Eastern palace?

Ziyaret-largeA reply was posted to a comment on the  server, at May 16, 2012, seems not to have been approved by The Independent.co.uk! Read them here. By Raimo Kangasniemi (2 days ago in reply to Garja1):Kurdish is an Indo-Iranian language. The term “Kurd”, by the way, is relatively recent, and the people in question go under various names in ancient sources and are pretty hard to identify because of that. The Kurdish language has little in the way of written sources before late medieval times. There has been attempts to connect the Kurds to some very ancient groups of people – like the Gutians in the late third millennium BCE – but those claims are based on little more than similarly sounding names and geographical proximity.

In reply to Raimo Kangasniemi (May 16, 2012):
Assumptions like Indo-Iranian, Indo-European, Aryan, ancient Iranian and Semitic languages and people are hoaxes. Their scientific legitimacies are refuted in the Bible Discovered, Bible = Babel (Babylon) and substantiated with hundreds of facts. See the book on http://www.elamirkan.net/?p=226
By the modern scholars identified determinatives for identification of names of the Gods, countries and cities are false.
Elam, Babylon, Sumer, Akkad, Hittite, Assyria, Gutians etc were not lands or country-languages. The ancient languages which are unjustly by the European experts called as Elamite, Sumerian, Babylonian, Akkadian, Hittitian, Assyrian, Gutians, Syriac, Persian etc. cannot stand. The texts are clearly written in the Kurdish myriad languages.
The term “Kurd” and the names of many Kurdish people appear from the earliest ancient texts.
The institutes and museums consciously or unconsciously provide still the world public and the scientific circuits with wrong information about early human civilizations, ethnography and the bible.

Remind them on their responsibility

The Darren Aronofsky’s $150 million Noah Ark movie for March 28th, 2014 (News of April 13, 2012)

What could be expected?

Probably this film Darren Aronofsky’s Noah Ark is also propaganda to depict Noah in the mind of men according to the contemporary false description, as we are accustomed.

The makers of this film are not aware of the Kurdish identity of Noah, since in the adopted available information sources Noah is falsely identified as an Arab (Semite’s ancestor). In the Bible the passages with the indication to Noah’s Kurdish background have been hidden and the traces in the archaeological texts sources, concern the Kurdish identity of Noah, have been destroyed or wiped away in the translations.

Perhaps for the shallow-brained men no matter identity of Noah whatever will be, but this is not just identity of a person! This is destroying of the native people, wiping away the name, the history, the cultural heritage, subsequently the existence of the native nation from mind and from history and replace the native nation with the Muslims conquerors, the Arabs, Persians and Turks invaders of the 7th – 10th centuries.

 

My revelations and substantiated evidences regards Kurdish national identity at all and the fact that Noah was a Kurdish descendent, kept silence by the western authorities, since there is no pressure from the Kurdish side to claim their own national identity (the history and cultural heritage of the Kurdish Nation) and to stop such crimes against Kurdish Nation.
For the scientific facts about the Biblical deluge and Noah’s identity I would like to refer Darren Aronofsky and Russell Crowe to Bible Discovered: Babel (Babylon) is Bible.
In the Bible Discovered, I claimed that more often than not, scholars and experts in this field who have the power to acknowledge and confront this reality don’t because they are “too busy with their own career.” By not taking the time to correct the wrongs, they are continuing to falsify ancient documents, and mislead public opinion by providing them with wrong information.
Everyone who gets this message, particularly the Kurds themselves should independently contact the movie producer and the ancient Near East institutes of the western universities and museums to remind them on their responsibility.
The Hague, April 20, 2012

Hamíit Qliji Bérai

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 10:51 AM

Translation of Hammurabi’s code of laws is structurally corrupted

Hammu-Rabi The ancient Near East celebrated Hammu-rabi king of Babylon 1795-1750 BC, who enacted the law code of Babylon, the Code of Hammurabi.

The contemporary understanding of the Code of Hammurabi is not correct. Structurally the translation should be corrected.

The texts are evidently identical to Kurdish language. In a text stands: ša haammuú-rabi lú Kurdaai, which means “Hammú.ŕabí the Kurdish king, king Hammú.ŕabí of the Kurds”. But in the translation the scholars wiped away the name Kurd.

This text has been corrupted and declared as Sumerian-Old-Babylonian ca.1800 BC from Mári in Syria (Kurdsu), (Letters to the King of Mari).

The name Hammurabi is not correct. It stands for Hammú-ŕabí, which means “Lord of the world, Lord of every one, Lord of the universe”. Hammú-ŕabí is probably a title, not a real name that is why he has been identified as Hammú-ŕabí 2; see “Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon), The Biblical Rabbi”.

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 2:15 AM

Betrayal linguistics, sociology, historiology and philosophy

The wrong assessments of ancient Near East also betray historians, sociologists and philosophers.

Philosophy and conceptual religion did not begin with the foundation of the Greek philosophy or the raising of the Chinese or Indic religion, around the sixth century before Christ.

There are archaeological evidences for philosophy and conceptual religion in ancient Near East from at least 7000 before Christ in Kurdish.

 

One of the premier sociologists, the America Robert Bellah in a recent book, “Religion in Human Evolution” tries to identify when religion emerged and how it changed through the centuries.

He ends with the Axial Age of the sixth century before Christ, focusing on ancient India, Israel, Greece and China.

Bellah identifies three stages: enactive, symbolic and conceptual. Basic rituals are part of the first, then myth and legend, and finally ethical and theological reasoning. The conceptual stage is one related to the Axial Age, roughly around the sixth century BC, when Plato and other thinkers founded Greek philosophy and the Buddha and other teachers raised Indic religion to a whole new conceptual level, according to Bellah.

 

From a Kurdish perspective in the book Bible Discovered, I made it clear that the modern sociology and philosophy are based on wrong assessments concern the early culture, history and ethnography of the mankind.

The very notion of the Axial, conceptual stage did not begin with the foundation of the Greek philosophy or the raising of the Chinese or Indic religion, around the sixth century before Christ.

The world’s most influential philosophies were founded at least 7000 before Christ in the ancient Near East in Kurdish language. The Axial symbols (Coptic Cross  and  Maltese Cross ) in the sense of “religious profession and act, mass, mission” occur on ancient Kurdish care bowls and dishes from 4000 BC; see the cover of Bible Discovered and pg. 104-105; also see under the well-known ancient Near East terms Din-ger-ki, Din-ker-ki, Ul-maš-ki.

The ancient Near East cuneiform sign (maš) means “act, mass, mission”.

The ancient Near East axis, axial, cuneiform sign (dinger, dinker) means “religious profession, cardinal; lawmaker”; from the root din “religion” and ger, ker “create, creator”. So din-ker is the origin of the word car-din-al “religious profession”.

These also make assured that the contemporary assumption – the origins of religious profession date from the time when Christians were recognized in the Church as followers after perfection in the practice of religious life, – is not real and should be corrected in: “the origins of religious profession date from the holy ancient Kurdish time when believers were recognized in the Kerk (Church) as followers after perfection in the practice of social life”, since religion was law and morality”.

 

April 3, 2012

Hamíit Qliji Bérai

State Savagery and Political Sadism

Today is the same as Henk Heithuis was sexually abused and castrated

The guilt of Wim Deetman is not less than them who have abused and castrated Henk Heithuis.

 The newspaper NRC reported on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Henk Heithuis – who reported being sexually abused by priests to the police in 1956, after giving evidence, he was placed in a Catholic-run psychiatric institution where he was then castrated.

The Deetman committee was informed about the castrations in writing but did not include mention of them in its report.

Wim Deetman is a prominent politician in the Christian Democrat party (CDA). The Deetman committee was set up by the Netherlands Catholic church itself in 2010 after the sexual abuse scandal broke. It reported in December having identified some 800 priests and monks who abused children in their care between 1945 and 1985.

The final Deetman report did not mention that Marijnen a Catholic leading politician had tried to have prison sentences dropped against several priests accused of abusing children in 1958.

Vic Marijnen, who went on to become prime minister in 1963, was chairman of the children’s home in the Netherlands where Henk Heithuis and dozens of other children were abused until 1959.

Wim Deetman is utterly corrupt, under his mayorship (1996 – 2008) The Hague was marked by the CDA-VVD Anti-integration strategy and misusing cultural supplies for criminal purposes.

See the Application against Dutch State in European Court of Human rights