Persian Cyrus the Great Brick-inscription is also hoax

The Babylonian Brick-inscription of Kúraš (the Cyrus II, 539 BC), Weiβbach 1911, pg. 8-9:

image9901

This conventional translation: “Cyrus, builder of Esagila and Ezida, son of Cambyses, the mighty king” is false.
The fragment and the names are clearly written in the Kurdish language. In the Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon), I have corrected it in two ways: A: Kúraš, I captured the Esáqian‘s (Isaacian’s) and Ezidian‘s patriarchs (Ápal), set up Kambūžiia their king; or B: Kúraš, I captured Esáqian (Isaacian) and Ezidian, set up the father (patriarch, Ápaĺ) Kambūžiia their king.

Anyway Esáq and Ersáq are Kurdish names for Issac which in Arabic, Farsi and Turks called Es’haq. So the Esagila and Ezida do not indicate temple, but the biblical Isaacian (the Jews) and the Ezidian people, probably they were the two actual ethnic religions.

The apal does not mean son, but it means papal, fatherly, patriarch. I have examined that in a lot of contexts throughout the book, see under apal.

The identification of this Kúraš (King of Babylon, 539-529 BC) as Persian is an unjustly Aryanization propaganda and it is clearly falsification of Kurdish historical documents.

In the inscriptions Kúraš Cylinder and Brick-inscription there is no mention of Persian or any evidence to prove that this Kúraš was a Bersian (Persian) or has anything to do with them. They report of regional rulers and ethnic struggle between different Kurdish ethnical territories.

For the Kúraš Cylinder see Cyrus cylinder’s ancient bill of rights ‘is just propaganda’ – Telegraph and  Falling for Ancient Propaganda: UN Treasure Honors Persian Despot – SPIEGEL
February 27, 2012 Hamíit Qliji Bérai

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 1:12 PM

Zoroastrianism is a fake religion fabricated about 1755 in western universities

Zoroastrianism is a fake religion and its philosophy based on false documents invented in western universities about 1755, in the course of Aryanization and the fabrication of Iran.

 This religious sect in Kerman, Isphahan and India did not know the word Zoroastrian, they were, before, called Gabrs by the Muslims, but they were not called Zoroastrians.

Gaber is the Arabic-Farsi form for the Kurdish gur < gr, the well-known ancient “gur, guru”. It is a Kurdish title, one of its meanings is “great” that is root for the English words great, guru and grand. All historical documents indicate that they were parts of the ancient Kakaians or Ezidians.

In reaction to: Zoroastrianism in Persia before Islam in Iran http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0AH-oFmU5M&feature=email

[The teachings of the Persian prophet Zoroaster founded in the early part of the 5th century BCE] doesn’t exist. In the 5th century BC documents is just the false name Ahura-Mazda and nothing else.

To understand how the Western experts have the Kurdish word Ura-maš-da, falsely demonstrated as Ahura-Mazda in such documents, see Ahura-Mazda stands for Ura-maš-da, which means “the mission of Ura (Abraham)”.

Ahura-Mazda is represented as The Great Aryans God of Prophet Zarathustra. Imagine when the God (Ahura-Mazda) is false, the prophet, his book and his faith could not be true.

The word form Zarathustra stands for the adopted Zartuasht, which appears to be a corrupt reading of the Kurdish Zard-wašt “yellow glow of the sun”, subsequently indicates the naturalists, the worshippers of the nature, the worshippers the yellow glow of the sun, the sun worshippers, the fire worshipers. They were the ancestors of the present Ezidian, Alhaqian and Kakaian the Kurdish sects who worship the morning and the evening “yellow glow of the sun”.

For discussion and scientific documentation see “Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)”.

 

WORSE IN THE WORST

Destroying of an ancient artwork is indeed destroying human heart, but destroying of the existence ancient of a native nation is destroying of the native nation in its whole.

In reaction to: Iraqi Museum Tragedy: “this destroyed my heart!!! A Parthian statue from Hatra may be of Hercules” The Iraqi Museum Tragedy on 12th of April 2003

 

The Kurdish Parthian Empire of the Arsáq (Arsac, Arsacid) dynasty c. 250 BC- 224 AD is falsely identified as Middle Persian of the “Ashkanid, Ashkanian” dynasty!

The Ashkanid, Ashkanian! Where do they come from?

See Parthian the Arsacid dynasty (Kurdish Ersáqi, the Xorásáni Kurds) (pg. 79-132 and under The biblical Isaac to be identified with Esáq, Ersáq) in the Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon).

January 25, 2012

Posted by

Review Bible Discovered by Mark G. McLaughlin, ForeWord Clarion

ForeWord Clarion Review NONFICTION: SOCIAL SCIENCE Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon) Hamíit Oliji Bérai CreateSpace 978-1-4663-1618-8 Four Stars (Out of Five) Mark G. McLaughlin, December 20, 2011

“When the legend becomes fact, print the legend,” is what a newspaper editor tells a young reporter in the classic John Ford western The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence. That is what generations of archaeologists, anthropologists, etymologists, and linguists have done in their reports on the language, culture, and history of the Kurdish people, according to author Hamíit Oliji Bérai in Bible Discovered.
Kurdistan “was in ancient past the birthplace of civilization and culture heritage of the human race” and its people were “the inventors of the wheel, the discoverers of script, the homeland of the empires, the forefathers of the world religions (polytheism the matriarchal culture; monotheism the patriarchal culture), the source of inspiration of western civilization, in other words, the mother of cultures.” Those accomplishments, claims Bérai, have been mistakenly, or even intentionally, attributed to other ethnic and cultural groups. Bible Discovered is meant for serious students of Biblical archaeology or interested amateurs seeking to broaden their understanding of the language, culture, and accomplishments of the ancient peoples of what Herodotus dubbed “Mesopotamia,” the land between the rivers.
The Kurds, whom Bérai says have inhabited that area continuously since before history was recorded, call this place Botania, or Jzira Botan, the “island” between the Tigris and the Euphrates. “Unfortunately, modern scholars,” he charges, “do not count Kurds and Kurdish in their work at all, they unfairly wipe away [the] name of the Kurds and replaced it unjustly with Turkish, Arabic, Iranian, Persian or Mesopotamian.”
Bérai backs up his thesis of what he calls a “fabrication” of history with hundreds of examples, including maps, photographs of archaeological sites, illustrations, and extensive translations of pictographs taken from steles, bowls, daggers, tablets, and other artifacts. His translation, reasoning, and conclusion will surely raise the eyebrows of traditional scholars, as Bérai challenges what two centuries of (mostly European) experts have published and still teach.
Those with a genuine interest and solid background in the archaeological, anthropological, cultural, and linguistic study of the ancient Near East will find Bible Discovered a fascinating, if controversial, counterclaim to accepted doctrine. Bérai presents a wealth of information for readers to examine.
Unlike the newspaper editor in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence, Bérai believes that, “when the facts contradict your theory, you should modify your theory, not the facts.” https://www.forewordreviews.com/reviews/bible-discovered/

 

Author seeks to correct contemporary accepted interpretations of ancient Near East civilization

Hamíit Qliji Bérai wants readers to know the truth about the ancient sources of human civilization in “Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)”

 

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – “Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)” (ISBN 1466316187) by Hamíit Qliji Bérai shows the world of the ancient Near East in a completely different way than some know it to be now. Written for those interested in human history, culture and religion, Bérai attempts to reveal what he believes is the truth about ancient sources of human civilization.

Bérai has researched and studied the discovery of the Bible for more than a decade. His results have shown a vastly different ancient Near East. He says that the culture and history thrust upon society about the ancient Near East is inadequate and deceptive.

Throughout this book, he demonstrates hundreds of times that the contemporary accepted interpretations and etymologies for the ancient Near East sources are illogical and contradictory speculations. He states that there is no fact to justify their inconsistency.

Coming from a Kurdish perspective, Bérai says that his initial intention of his research was not the Bible, but rather to right the wrongs imposed by ill-conceived notions. However, throughout his years of research he discovered tangible traces of evidence that justify many biblical accounts.

He claims that, more often than not, scholars and experts in his field who have the power to acknowledge and confront this reality don’t because they are “too busy with their own career.” By not taking the time to correct the wrongs, he says that they are continuing to falsify ancient documents, and mislead public opinion by providing them with wrong information.

Bérai’s book is filled with unique information as it provides a realistic and ample amount of understanding of the ancient sources of human civilization. He calls for a serious re-evaluation of what is being put out in academic works and to the public about ancient Near East.

“Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)” is available for sale online at Amazon.com and other channels.

About the Author:

Hamíit Qliji Bérai is an independent researcher who has spent the majority of his life researching the ancient Near East. Bérai has researched all over the world for different universities including the University of Leiden Netherlands, the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge and the University of Chicago. He is currently researching ancient Near Eastern sources in the British Museum, London University and the British Library in London.

Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)

Reviewed by Mark G. McLaughlin, independent reviewer:

(December 9, 2011)

Those with a genuine interest and solid background in the archaeological, anthropological, cultural, and linguistic study of the ancient Near East will find Bible Discovered a fascinating, if controversial, counterclaim to accepted doctrine.

Bérai presents a wealth of information for readers to examine. …

 

MEDIA CONTACT

Hamíit Qliji Bérai

Email: hqberai@elamirkan.net

Phone: 0031638284465

Website: http://elamirkan.net

REVIEW COPIES AND INTERVIEWS AVAILABLE

 

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 4:59 AM

Deception of Zaza people based on Aryanization

The culture and history thrust upon society about the Zázá people, what is being put out in academic works and to the public is deceptive, based on Aryanization in the historical and cultural meanings

I would like to recommend everyone interested in the International Conference (below) to read Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon) (pg. 29, 67, 73-5, 125-126, 232), before join the conference, since the culture and history thrust upon society about the Zázá people is inadequate and deceptive, based on Aryanization in the historical and cultural meanings.

In the Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon) I have substantiated it by archaeological ancient texts in regard to Zázáian people.

I call for a serious re-evaluation of what is being put out in academic works and to the public about ancient Near East.

There is also a press release online:

http://www.mmdnewswire.com/bible-discovered-bible-babel-babylon-73222.html

Although too late, I understood, there is an International Conference

THE ZAZA PEOPLE: HISTORY, LANGUAGE, CULTURE, IDENTITY – Yerevan, Armenia, 28-30 October, 2011

The Conference is organized by the International Journal (BRILL, Leiden-Boston) “Iran and the Caucasus” the Study of Iranian Ethnic Groups of the Region

In commemoration of the 155th anniversary of the great German-Armenian scholar, pioneer of the Zaza Studies, Academician FRIEDRICH CARL ANDREAS (BAGRATOUNI) (1846-1930).

 

Kind of regards,

Hamiit Qliji Berai

http://www.elamirkan.net/

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 1:18 AM

Patrons of the Nazi heritage

Patrons of the Nazi heritage prepare propaganda against the “Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)” They draw the youth into the struggle

 

The following article appeared in the October 18, 2011 on the website of Dr. Robert Cargill http://robertcargill.com/2011/10/18/the-iranian-influence-on-judaism-at-bible-and-interpretation/ “Iranian influence on Judaism, By Jason M Silverman, Trinity College Dublin, October 2011; Persepolis and Jerusalem (T&T Clark Int’l, 2012)”.

I said in Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon) –http://www.amazon.com/dp/1466316187/ref=tsm_1_fb_lk , – that the institutes and museums, consciously or unconsciously, provide still the world public and the scientific circuits with wrong information about early human civilizations, ethnography and the bible.

Iranian does not exist in ancient time to have influence on Judaism. Such books and articles are scientifically baseless. You cannot find any trace of Iran, Iranian, Ari or Aryan in the ancient times. Can you prove the existence of Iran or Aryan in ancient time?

The pseudo-scientific evidences for some of these adopted terms and assumptions are based on falsification of ancient Kurdish documents from Bogazkoy by the Nazi professors like ANNELIES KAMMENHUBER, Die Arier im Vorderen Orient and MANFRED MAYRHOFER, Die Indo-Arier im alten Vorderasien (Wiesbaden 1966) Mayrhofer 1966, pp. 13ff), in the course of the Aryanization.

Jason M Silverman, for Iranian influence on Judaism, refers to Persepolis and Zarathustrianism, both Persepolis and Zarathustrianism are false.

The architect Krefter has recognized the false reconstruction of Persepolis on ruins of an Elamite palace, see Who was his majesty Pahlavi king?

For Zarathustrianism zie “Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)” pg. 100-120 chapter: Ahura-Mazda is a corruption of “the mission of Abraham”. Ahura-Mazda stands for Ura-maš-da, which means “the mission of Ura (Abraham)”. Ahura-Mazda is The Great Aryans God of Prophet Zarathustra. Imagine when the God (Ahura-Mazda) is false, the prophet, his book and his faith could not be true.

Persian cannot be qualified as Iranian. Evidently from the texts and artifacts that are named Persians nothing is Persians.

 

October 19th 2011, The Hague

Hamíit Qliji Bérai

 

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 11:08 PM

The Persepolis is not authentic

An independent Persian researcher Naser Pourpirar has proven that the Persepolis palace has never been used, since no part of the building work was completed. He shows how the ruins of an Elamite temple/palace has been wiped away and the Persepolis is fabricated on it. Also an official investigation commission of experts in Iran has confirmed the falsifications.

Pourpirar claims that the Achaemenids Persepolis is fabricated with the purpose to refute the ancient history and civilization of Iran and the Iranian.

He is not aware of the fact that Iran itself at all is the greatest European Racist-Nazis fabrication. There is no any name nor history neither civilization of Iran, Iranian or Aryan  in ancient sources.

Krefter has recognized the false reconstruction Persepolis

PERSEPOLIS REKONSTRUKTIONEN, FRIEDRICH KREFTER, Berlin 1971, p.9-10, 107)

Friedrich Krefter (architect) states clearly that they jointly with Erich Friedrich Schmidt (archaeologist) have falsely constructed the Persepolis palace building upon the ancient Elamite (Kurdish) ruins that does not resemble with both actual sketches and the remainder materials construction of the ruin, which led to wrong products.

(Nach den Schmidtschen Bezeichnungen handelt es sich um die Paläste »G«-»H« und »D«, in meinem Lageplan die Paläste Nr. 15 und 17, und Nr. 19, der Paradeisos. Als dritte Stelle kommt das provisorische Arbeitstor an der Nordwestecke der Terrasse hinzu.

Für Palast 15 sowohl wie für Palast 17 gilt festzuhalten, daß in der Ruine in beiden Fällen nur Reste der

Unterkonstruktionen vorhanden sind, nichts aber, oder fast nichts vom eigentlichen Palastgrundriß. Diese Tatsache geht einem Nichtarchitekten beim Anblick der Ruine und bei deren Ausdeutung immer wieder aus dem Bewußtsein und führt zu falschen Schlüssen. Man kann also nicht sagen, die Ausgräber hätten »G« vernachlässigt, bei »G« ist für den besten Ausgräber nichts mehr zu holen. Man kann auch nicht sagen, jemand wolle in »D« ohne jeden Anlaß einen Palast für die Armeesehen. Vom Erdgeschoß von »D« ist eben jenes L-förmige Sockelteil übriggeblieben, das schon den frühesten Persepolis-Reisenden auffiel und zu dem Flandin-Coste Bruchstücke eines geflügelten Stieres gefunden hatten. Diese Tatsache zusammen mit der Darstellung der vielen Offiziere auf der Tripylontreppe waren Anlaß genug, meine Schlußfolgerungen zu ziehen.Und Schmidt hatte schon ganz ähnlich gefolgert. Ebenso verhält es sich bei »G«, wo auch vom eigentlichen Palast fast nichts mehr vorhanden ist. Aber der Nachweis von Schmidt, daß die Treppe von »H« nach »G« gehört, genügt, um hinter dieser Sockel front mit Garden und Saaldienern, und vielleicht auch Tributbringern, einen Palast und nicht einen Garten entstehen zu lassen. Bei »D« sowohl wie bei »G« sind Gärten unmöglich, selbst wenn man die Blumen vorsorglich in Kübeln unterbringen wollte, weil die jeweiligen Unterkonstruktionen aus Lehmziegeln errichtet sind und nicht, wie z. B. In Babyion, aus gebrannten Ziegeln. Diese Schlußfolgerungen sind unausweichlich. Palast »H« habe ich vorläufig nach Zurückverlegung seiner Treppen nach »G« außer Betracht gelassen, bis die Ausgräber festgestellt haben werden, was vor der jetzigen Ruine »H« an dieser Stelle gestanden haben könnte. Eine schwierige Aufgabe, die ihrer Lösung harrt. Und schließlich erscheint es mir unmöglich, die Reste eines Arbeitstores am Steinbruch vor der Nordwestecke der Terrasse in einen Kultplatz verwandeln zu wollen, so plastisch man das auch darstellen mag.)

Links to the statements of Naser Pourpirar

Here below links to the Pourpirar’ statements, the confirmation of the commission and the film Nobodypolis in four parts with his explanations.

Nobodypolis 4/4 http://tinyurl.com/yu9fo2

Purim is discussed in the Bible Discovered: Bible = Babel (Babylon)

 

Testimonial Request Letter

In May 13, 2011, I circulated this testimonial request letter to the experts in the field of ancient Near East, asking if anyone of the experts wants to read the manuscript Bible Discovered, Bible = Babel (Babylon) and to say something about it. But, no one wanted to do that.
Dear Prof. Dr. …,

Could you do me a favor? Of course, I realize that you are extremely busy and I apologize for imposing on your time.

I’m in the process of publishing my book Bible Discovered “Bible = Babel, Babylon

and want to include examples of testimonials. I would love to include your statement about my book.

Would you be willing to read the manuscript (400 pages) and say something about it in a couple of lines; for example how it is important to correct and reevaluate the conventional scientific wisdom of ancient Near East.

I’m planning to get this completed in the next six weeks, so if you could reply by 15 June it would really help. Please let me know. I hope that I can have the opportunity to share the manuscript with you soon.

Thanks in anticipation,

Hamíit Qliji Bérai May 13, 2011 Institute Elamirkan www.elamirkan.net

Who was the “His Majesty the Pahlavi King Mohammad Reza, King of Kings of Iran, Aryamehr”, still honored by the Nazis? And why?

This Highness Majesty was the successor of his father Reza Shah. In, Berai 2002, (§17.1) I explained widespread, how the Brits brought to power own obscure illiterate stableboy, Reza Alashti Sawadkohi, a military horses’ servant of the British consulate in Teheran. The Brits injected Blue-blood in him and was made shah in 1925, awarded him the title Pahlavi King Reza Shah, King of Kings of Iran, Aryamehr The Declassified U.S. State Department archives confirms that (Great Britain and Reza Shah: The Plunder of Iran, 1921-1941. By Mohammad Gholi Majd. University Press of Florida, 2001).

who was Reza Aryamehr who was Reza

 

Krefter has recognized the false reconstruction Persepolis

PERSEPOLIS REKONSTRUKTIONEN, FRIEDRICH KREFTER, Berlin 1971, p.9-10, 107):

The exhibition “7000 Years Art in Iran” from the 16.2. to 24.4.1962 in Villa Hügel in Essen was the occasion for the director, at that time of the Teheraner, department of the German Archaeological Institute, professor dr. Heinz Luschey, to propose to me the task to accomplish reconstructions of the buildings of the palace terrace of Persepolis in graphic form and describe these reconstructions. The work began in April 1963. In the autumn 1965, the Persian government invited me to visit and spend several days in Iran on Persepolis. During the year 1967 work was interrupted, in order to manufacture a model of the palace terrace in this time, “that as a present of the Federal Government for the anniversary of the crowing of His Majesty Pahlavi-King Mohammad Reza, King of Kings of Iran, Aryamehr (das als Geschenk der Bundesregierung zur Krönung S. M. Mohammad Reza Schahs Pahlavi, Schahenscha von Iran, Aryamehr am), on October 26, 1967 was presented. See Persepolis is Not Authentic

(I explained widespread this subject in Berai 2002 (17.1) Mostafa Kamal en de Engelse portier Rezaxan Sawadkohi de juiste fasciste figuren voor hervormingen)

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 6:02 AM

Ahura-Mazda “The Great Aryans (Iranians) God of Zarathustra” is a false reading of the Kurdish Ura.maš.da which seems to be an indication to The Mission of Prophet Abraham

Ahura-Mazda stands for Ura-maš-da, which according to Kurdish, means “the mission of Ura (Abraham)”.

Ura, uri, urám, abráim, bráhím are Kurdish names for Abraham.

The (Kurdish) maš “act, mass”, is origin of the biblical mass, mission, missionary to which the biblical Cross symbol is dedicated.

The suffix –da is objective definite article here and very common in Kurdish.

 ura mas da God of Zarathustra
U ra maš da Uramašda (Ahura-Mazda)

The sculptures and inscriptions of Behistun, 1907, (Babylonian version, I, 99)
I am very looking forward to your comments. The subjects I briefly discuss here, are treated extensively in the book:

The Bible (patriarchal-books) is derived from the Babil (Babylon) “Fatherly, patriarchal”

Posted by Hamiit Qliji Berai at 11:47 PM